I was unsure which book I should choose for a famous author's first book and it took me a while to sus out who I wanted to read, but finally I decided... or rather I was looking through the college library and just happened to come across Margaret Atwood's first novel, so I decided why the heck not and gave it ago. If you've been following my blog for a while, you will have seen that about a year ago I did a series of blog posts analysing The Handmaid's Tale, but is probably one of Atwood's most notable novels. As much as I 'enjoyed' reading The Handmaid's Tale, (I'm not sure enjoyed is the right word to use), I found it quite thick to plough through and it took a certain mindset. Going from my previous experience, I set myself plenty of time to read this book. As it was, I finished it in about a week.
The Edible Women is a story of Marian, and the strange effect her recent engagement has on her. When the last of her boyfriend Peter's friends get married, he finds himself lonely and depressed, finally coming round to the idea that he should propose to Marian and get married himself. Of course Marian says yes and everything looks peachy. However shortly after getting engaged Marian finds that she starts struggling to eat certain foods and eventually goes completely nil by mouth. Meanwhile she starts an affair with Duncan although she has no idea why or what grounds the affair is based on. The only thing she really knows is that Duncan is using her and she begins to wonder if she is using him in return, though what she is using him for remains a mystery.
While all this is going on Ainsley, Marian's flat mate, decides that men are over rated and purposefully gets herself pregnant to prove that a mother can raise a child better on her own that with a father figure beside her. Everything was going to plan until, at a pre-natal class, Ainsley is told that boys born without a father figure will almost certainly grow up to be homosexual, and with this Ainsley's whole objective changes. Now she must find a husband.
This is a very bizarre book. I found it much easier to read than the previous Atwood I had read, but I also found that what I was reading wasn't actually very much. Nothing really happens in the book, although lots does, if you get what I mean. A lot of the feminist attitudes that Atwood is famous for can be seen very clearly even in the first of her novels, but still the actually events in the book are a little underwhelming.
I would have liked to have a little more explanation and reasoning to what happened to Marian. The main points in the book seemed to take place with little or no though to cause and effect leaving you unable to concentrate on the rest of the book because you're still trying to work out what happened in the last part you just read.
One thing I did find very effective (Once I worked out what Atwood had done) was the way the parts 1 and 3 were in the first person, while part 2 was in the third. This was effective in showing how the events of the novel had almost separated her from herself and she didn't really feel part of anything. You really understand, that in the middle section of the book, Marian feels as if she is an observer to her own life rather than the person living it. At the end of the book, the narrative returns to first person and you get the impression that she has found who she is again and has found peace in her life. She can direct and live her own life.
Although I'm not to sure about this one, I did 'enjoy' reading the Handmaid's Tale and I think that I will in fact read 'Oryx and Crake' which is sat on my desk at home. as you would expect, there are plenty of pointers that this is a debut novel, written by an author who, now, has honed her gift to near perfection.
As always, just because I didn't particularly get this book, doesn't mean you wont. Give it a shot, see what you think. If we all enjoyed reading the same books then life would be very boring indeed.
